# Klaviyo vs ActiveCampaign: One Sends You Everything and Shows You Nothing

> Klaviyo 3.88 against ActiveCampaign 3.44: opposite failures of price publishing, a free tier against none, monthly against annual, and channels against branching logic.

_Source: https://professionalstoolkit.com/articles/klaviyo-vs-activecampaign — The Professional's Toolkit · updated 2026-10-08_

---


`klaviyo vs activecampaign` and its reverse draw 220 searches a month between them, a sixth of
the Mailchimp pairing but the second-largest comparison in this category. The two products are
further apart than that number suggests, and the most interesting difference is not a feature.
It is what each one does with its own price list.

Klaviyo scores 3.88 on our eight axes. ActiveCampaign scores 3.44.

## Two opposite failures of the same obligation

ActiveCampaign publishes its entire price list and displays almost none of it. Its pricing page
yields 3,180 characters of extracted text containing no dollar amount at all, while the markup
behind it runs to 1,410,272 characters carrying ten prices. The vendor's own billing catalogue,
which that page fetches at load time using a token it issues to any visitor, carries eighteen
products, fourteen metered entitlements and contact ladders of up to forty-nine bands. A second
copy is published as a static file with no authentication.

Klaviyo does the reverse. It publishes no email tier price on its pricing page, and the page is
not hiding a catalogue either: requesting it at `?contacts=5000` and `?contacts=25000` returns
the same dollar amounts in the same counts [3]. There is no ladder to find, because the
ladder is computed in the reader's browser.

So one vendor sends you everything and shows you nothing. The other shows you a calculator and
sends nothing. A buyer ends up equally uninformed, and only one of the two could fix it by
changing a template.



> 💡 **undefined:** Normalise the billing period before comparing headline figures. One vendor's published price is a year and the other's is a month.

## What each one costs to start

| | Klaviyo | ActiveCampaign |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | yes: 250 profiles, 500 sends, $5 mobile, $5 Composer | none; a free trial only |
| Entry paid price | $20 a month, in a discount's terms | published per product, tier and band in the catalogue |
| Billing period | monthly | every published price is annual |
| Billing unit | active profiles, plus metered sends | contacts, with user seats as a second axis |
| Seats | not a pricing axis | 1 included on Starter, 2 maximum |

The free plan is the first real divide. Klaviyo has one and ActiveCampaign does not, which
matters more than a feature comparison for anyone testing before committing. Klaviyo's free tier
is also the only place in its product where the bill cannot move, because exceeding the limit
stops sending rather than charging [5].

The second divide is the billing period. Every price ActiveCampaign publishes is annual, which
makes its headline figures look closer to Klaviyo's monthly ones than they are. Klaviyo
publishes no annual option at all.

The third is seats. ActiveCampaign prices on contacts and user seats together, capping Starter
at two seats. Klaviyo does not charge per seat, which for a team of five is a material
difference that neither pricing page makes obvious.

## Depth against breadth

ActiveCampaign is a marketing automation product with a CRM attached, strongest on
multi-condition automations and the logic between them. Klaviyo is a B2C customer data platform
with channels attached, strongest on what it knows about a shopper and how many ways it can
reach them.

Klaviyo carries six channels on one profile, a helpdesk, an AI support agent, a loyalty-aware
customer portal and a data platform the vendor says holds 7.3 billion consumer profiles
[12]. ActiveCampaign carries deeper branching logic, a sales pipeline, and the kind of
B2B-shaped features, deal stages, lead scoring across a sales team, that Klaviyo does not
attempt.

That is the honest shape of it. If your customer is a person buying a product, Klaviyo. If your
customer is an account with a sales cycle, ActiveCampaign is built closer to that.



> 💡 **undefined:** If you have more than two people in the tool, price ActiveCampaign's seats explicitly. Klaviyo does not charge for them.

## AI, where the terms differ more than the features

Both products ship AI. Klaviyo publishes what it costs: Composer at twenty dollars a month with
five dollars of usage included and ten dollars per thousand credits beyond, and Customer Agent
at fifty dollars for seventy-five resolved shopper conversations [5] [2]. It also names
the models it connects to, with published Claude and ChatGPT connectors and an MCP server
[15] [16].

ActiveCampaign's AI is metered from zero included units on its lower tiers, which is a different
shape of risk: Klaviyo gives you an allowance and a rate, ActiveCampaign gives you a rate.

Klaviyo scores 4.2 on this axis. The score is for the terms, not the magic.

## What ActiveCampaign's catalogue actually contains

It is worth describing, because it is the most complete price disclosure in this category and
almost nobody has seen it.

The catalogue the pricing page fetches carries eighteen products, fourteen metered entitlements
and contact ladders running up to forty-nine bands. That is a genuine price list: product by
tier by band, with the metered extras alongside. It is served to every visitor's browser, and a
second copy sits as a static file with no authentication at all.

What the visible page does is collapse three dimensions into one number. Price is a function of
product, tier and contact band, and each card shows the first band of one tier of one product,
prefixed "Starts at". Three things go missing in that collapse: the other bands, the other
products, and that every published figure is annual.

Set that beside Klaviyo, where there is no catalogue to find. Requesting the pricing page at
different bands returns identical dollar amounts [3], because the ladder exists only as
arithmetic performed in the reader's browser.

Which is worse depends on what you mean. ActiveCampaign has published everything and informed
nobody. Klaviyo has published one number and a method. Only the first could be fixed by changing
a template, which is either a point in its favour or an indictment, depending on how charitable
you feel.



> ⚠ **undefined:** ActiveCampaign has no free plan, so a genuine trial of the workflow needs a commitment Klaviyo does not require.

## The free tier, which is the sharpest practical difference

Klaviyo's free plan is real and renewing: 250 active profiles, 500 email sends a month, five
dollars of mobile messaging and five dollars of Composer usage [2]. It is also the only
place in Klaviyo's product where the bill cannot move, because the published consequence of
exceeding it is that sending stops rather than that the price rises [5].

ActiveCampaign has no free plan. It has a trial, whose length its pricing page states.

For a buyer, that difference is larger than it looks on a feature grid. A free tier lets you
build a real flow against real data and discover whether the product fits before any money
changes hands. A trial puts a clock on the same exercise, and the clock usually runs out during
the part where you are waiting for someone else to send you the brand assets.

It also changes who can recommend the tool internally. A free account can be shown. A trial has
to be justified first.

## Integrations

Klaviyo claims 350+ and we could not count them. Its integrations directory serves 1,817,706
characters of markup that produce seven characters of visible text and name no integration at
all [13]. What is verifiable is a strong ecommerce set: Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento,
WooCommerce, PrestaShop, Wix, Square Online, Commerce Cloud: plus a public API and an MCP
server.

ActiveCampaign's catalogue is, characteristically, fully published and awkward to read. Both
score in the high threes on this axis for opposite reasons: one has a strong verifiable core and
an uncountable claim, the other has a complete list nobody can navigate.



> ⚠ **undefined:** Klaviyo's auto-downgrade cannot run alongside the auto-upgrade that ships switched on. Choosing one means switching off the other.

## The direction the bill travels

This is where the comparison gets practical.

Klaviyo's plan climbs automatically and by default, and comes down only when you arrange it,
inside a twenty-four-hour window, with no refunds, and not at all while an invoice is open
[5]. The auto-downgrade preference cannot run alongside the auto-upgrade that ships switched
on [11].

ActiveCampaign's annual billing makes the same question look different: you are committing for a
year, so the within-year ratchet matters less and the renewal conversation matters more. Neither
is obviously better. They are different distributions of the same risk, and the right one
depends on whether your list is seasonal.

## The seat question, which neither page makes obvious

ActiveCampaign prices on two axes at once: contacts and user seats. Starter includes one seat
and caps at two. Plus includes one and allows up to 999. Professional includes three, Enterprise
five. So a five-person marketing team on Starter is not a cheaper plan; it is an impossible one,
and the real comparison starts a tier higher than the card you were reading.

Klaviyo does not price on seats at all. The account costs what the profiles and the sends cost,
whether one person or fifteen are logged in.

For a solo operator this changes nothing. For an agency, or a team where the designer, the
copywriter and the analyst all need access, it is often the largest single difference between
the two bills, and neither pricing page surfaces it next to the headline figure.

It also interacts with the annual commitment. If you add seats mid-year on ActiveCampaign you
are amending an annual contract; on Klaviyo there is nothing to amend because seats are not a
billable unit.

## Scores, side by side

Klaviyo 3.88, ActiveCampaign 3.44, on identical weights for this category. Klaviyo's lead comes
from capability at 4.5, AI at 4.2 and documentation at 4.0, the last being the highest
documentation score we have given any product. ActiveCampaign's pricing transparency is better
in a literal sense, everything is published, and worse in the sense that matters, because
nothing is legible.

Both score poorly on support relative to everything else, which appears to be a category-wide
pattern rather than a vendor-specific one.

## Support and sentiment, where neither wins

Klaviyo scores 2.7 on support and reliability, its weakest axis by a distance. Across a hundred
Trustpilot reviews we coded, support appears in fifty-nine and fifty-three of those are one or
two stars [20]. The complaint has a consistent shape: "Putting the customer support behind a
paywall is appalling!" writes one reviewer; another, on a large account, "We pay $4k a month and
only have access to AI chatbots who take you around in circles."

That second sentence is worth sitting with, because Klaviyo sells AI support agents to other
companies as a solution to exactly this problem.

ActiveCampaign scores poorly on the same axis for its own reasons. The pattern across this
category is consistent enough that we would treat support quality as something to verify for
yourself during a trial rather than something to infer from a score, whichever vendor you pick.

Klaviyo does publish more reliability data: 99.95% uptime alongside 2.5 billion daily events
[12]. It also draws 720 searches a month for "is klaviyo down", and its status page yields
no readable incident history to anything that does not execute its scripts.

## If you are migrating between them

The import is not the cost. The flows are.

An account with mature automation: abandoned cart, browse abandonment, post-purchase, win-back,
or on the ActiveCampaign side a branching nurture with scoring: represents months of iteration,
and none of it transfers. Attribution history does not transfer either, so the year-on-year
comparisons your reporting depends on restart on the day you switch.

The direction matters too. Moving to Klaviyo means rebuilding logic against a shopper profile
that holds orders and behaviour, which usually simplifies what you had. Moving to
ActiveCampaign means rebuilding channel work as branching logic, which usually expands it.

Budget a quarter of parallel running rather than a weekend, and do it in your quiet season.



## FAQ

**Which is better for ecommerce, Klaviyo or ActiveCampaign?**

Klaviyo, clearly. It is built around a shopper profile with orders and behaviour on it, carries six channels against that profile, and publishes ecommerce integrations for every major store platform. ActiveCampaign is stronger where the customer is an account with a sales cycle.

**Does ActiveCampaign have a free plan?**

No. It offers a free trial whose length its pricing page states, but there is no free tier. Klaviyo has a real one: 250 active profiles, 500 sends a month, plus five dollars each of mobile messaging and Composer usage.

## Who should pick which

Pick Klaviyo if you sell to consumers, want SMS and email on one profile, and value a free tier
you can actually test with.

Pick ActiveCampaign if you sell to businesses, need branching automation and a pipeline more
than you need channels, and can commit annually.

Pick neither on the headline price, because one of them publishes a year's figure next to the
other's month, and both leave your actual band to a conversation.




## Sources

[1] Klaviyo vendor pricing page, read from the United States — https://www.klaviyo.com/pricing (2026-10)
[2] Klaviyo vendor pricing page at a requested band of twenty-five thousand profiles — https://www.klaviyo.com/pricing?contacts=25000 (2026-10)
[3] Klaviyo promotional offer terms — https://www.klaviyo.com/legal/$19-off-promotion (2026-10)
[4] Klaviyo vendor documentation on billing — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000976672 (2026-10)
[5] Klaviyo vendor FAQ, February 2026 billing change — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/33136281415451 (2026-10)
[6] Klaviyo vendor FAQ, July 2026 mobile messaging change — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/52952739755931 (2026-10)
[7] Klaviyo vendor documentation on changing plans — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/8356575957275 (2026-10)
[8] Klaviyo vendor documentation on manual billing — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/18745921973915 (2026-10)
[9] Klaviyo vendor documentation on mobile messaging — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/13502982552347 (2026-10)
[10] Klaviyo vendor documentation on upgrade preferences — https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/4405883690651 (2026-10)
[11] Klaviyo vendor enterprise page — https://www.klaviyo.com/enterprise (2026-10)
[12] Klaviyo vendor integrations page — https://www.klaviyo.com/platform-integrations (2026-10)
[13] Klaviyo vendor AI page — https://www.klaviyo.com/solutions/ai (2026-10)
[14] Klaviyo vendor Claude connector page — https://www.klaviyo.com/integrate/claude (2026-10)
[15] Klaviyo developer documentation, MCP server — https://developers.klaviyo.com/en/docs/klaviyo_mcp_server (2026-10)
[16] Klaviyo vendor comparison against Mailchimp — https://www.klaviyo.com/compare/klaviyo-vs-mailchimp (2026-10)
[17] Klaviyo vendor comparison against Salesforce Marketing Cloud — https://www.klaviyo.com/compare/klaviyo-vs-salesforce-marketing-cloud (2026-10)
[18] Shopify App Store listing for Klaviyo — https://apps.shopify.com/klaviyo-email-marketing (2026-10)
[19] Trustpilot aggregate and review corpus for klaviyo.com — https://www.trustpilot.com/review/klaviyo.com (2026-10)
[20] Klaviyo vendor support packages page — https://www.klaviyo.com/success/premium-support (2026-10)
[21] Klaviyo's published ChatGPT connector — https://www.klaviyo.com/integrate/chatgpt